Based on an article from The Korea Times, a recent nationwide survey has revealed that nearly half of South Korea’s judges have experienced external pressure while presiding over cases, highlighting the increasing vulnerability of the judiciary amid rising negative media coverage and hostile public opinion. As courts are tasked with handling high-profile and socially sensitive trials, judges face mounting challenges—from intense political criticism to personal attacks and threats. The report details how this pressure has come not only from within institutions but also through online doxxing, malicious commentary, and even physical confrontations—forces that have caused severe stress and, in some cases, led judges to consider stepping down.
These findings are especially relevant in the context of Pastor Jung Myeong Seok’s trial, which unfolded under a cloud of intense media negativity and widespread societal bias. Given the highly charged atmosphere, the judges involved likely faced extraordinary levels of public scrutiny and external influence. As in many controversial trials, these factors raise serious concerns about how impartiality and justice can be preserved when courts are placed in the crosshairs of public emotion and political agendas. The data underscores the urgent need for stronger safeguards to uphold judicial independence in an era where public opinion can easily overshadow due process.
